Movies & EntertainmentNews

Government Ad During Dancing With The Stars Prompts Disney+ Backlash

Disney+ viewers streaming Monday's live Dancing With the Stars episode got a commercial they weren't expecting.

An ad featuring President Donald Trump, with a disclaimer saying it was paid for by the U.S. Government.

Four separate Threads discussions went up within minutes.

Some context.

“I mute as soon as the ads come on, and I glanced at the screen and literally, jump scare,” wrote user miss_amandajones.

“It's even more chilling with the sound on,” wrote user kate12303.

One viewer asked why the U.S. Government would fund an ad featuring a sitting president. Another asked Disney+ to pull it. A third said Disney owes an apology and pointed out the show tapes in Los Angeles.

And then a few people mentioned something that changed the whole conversation.

Alfonso Ribeiro and Julianne Hough on the set of Dancing With The Stars.
Credit: D23

They Saw It Everywhere Else

One commenter said it ran on cable.

Another said it ran during the Big Brother finale. On CBS. The week before.

Here is why that matters.

Dancing With The Stars airs on ABC and streams live on Disney+. On a live simulcast, the ad breaks in the stream generally carry the same national inventory as the linear broadcast. National buys are placed across networks, dayparts, and platforms, with much of it programmatically.

Which is exactly what viewers described. Same ad, Disney+, cable, and a CBS show that has nothing to do with Disney.

So this reads as national ad inventory showing up in a bunch of places, not Disney handpicking an advertiser for a dance competition.

Disney has not commented, so that is an inference rather than a confirmation. But it is a pretty strong inference.

Worth knowing before you aim.

A Lot of People Aimed at Disney Anyway

“Disney/ABC are massive disappointments for pandering to this administration,” wrote user junebugtraveler, who kicked off one of the threads.

And one commenter brought up history.

“FFS, he tried to sue you!!!!!” wrote user jenkettleson.

Donald Trump laughs in front of a picture of Mickey Mouse in Magic Kingdom Park at Walt Disney World Resort.
Credit: Disney Fanatic

That is a reference to the defamation suit Trump filed against ABC and Disney over a 2024 broadcast, which settled in December 2024 with Disney agreeing to contribute to a future presidential foundation and museum, plus legal fees.

That background is a big part of why some viewers read an ad on a Disney platform as a relationship instead of just inventory.

About That Disclaimer

Commenters zeroed in on the wording, and they were right to.

“‘Paid for by the US Government'?!?!?” wrote user kdefrank.

There is an actual category distinction here.

Campaign ads are FEC-regulated and carry disclaimers naming the campaign or committee footing the bill. Government public communication is a different animal entirely. Federal agencies buy advertising all the time for military recruitment, public health campaigns, and census participation. Taxpayer-funded, government-disclaimed.

One commenter made exactly that point, noting that the ad is framed as a public service announcement and objecting that it is taxpayers who are paying, not some abstract government.

Where does informing the public stop and promoting the guy currently in charge start? Genuinely contested. Versions of that fight have come up about administrations from both parties, and there is no tidy answer.

What nobody disputes: people who sat down for ballroom dancing did not sign up for that question.

The One Thing That Actually Works

“Thankful for my no ads plan!” wrote user bethie200.

Ad-free Disney+ serves no commercial inventory. Those subscribers never saw it at all, which is why half of some threads were people asking what everybody was so upset about.

Rough timing, though. Disney raised streaming prices last week. Disney+ Premium, the ad-free one, reportedly went from $18.99 to $21.49.

So the exit from Disney+ advertising now costs $2.50 more than it did seven days ago. Perfect.

Is Anybody Actually Canceling

“I guess if we don't boycott Disney, this will be our new normal,” wrote user heated_obsession.

Be honest, though. Cancellation threats spike online constantly, and subscriber counts keep climbing anyway. Last week's price hike generated a mountain of identical posts.

What usually happens is quieter. Some ad-tier people upgrade. Some cancel and come back when something good drops. Churn and return. That has been the real pattern for years.

Britt Stewart, Alan Bersten, and Witney Carson posing on the Dancing With The Stars ballroom stage.
Credit: ABC

Disney's Response

Nothing. No statement, no comment on the complaints, no word on whether anything changes.

DWTS keeps streaming live Tuesdays at 8/7c, ads included on the ad tiers.

Sources: Threads discussions beginning with posts by users junebugtraveler, lexactuallyreads, cjakesmyle, and kate12303.

Erica Lauren

Erica Lauren is a theme park writer and content creator based in Orlando, Florida, allowing her easy access to Walt Disney World, Universal Orlando Resort, and other attractions. As a frequent park visitor, she offers an authentic perspective from her experiences in the parks. A dedicated runDisney participant, Erica combines her love for running with theme parks, making unforgettable memories on their magical courses. When she's not writing or racing, she’s planning her next adventure with the goal of discovering new theme parks. As a thrill ride enthusiast, her favorite spot is always in the front row of the fastest coaster, with plenty of trip reports to share.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles